*** Summary statistics for the S-ESTREND data. *** Constituent: Mn Station: 38 126 observations from 06/23/1967 to 07/06/1998 105 less than values and 1 zero values ( 84.1 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 0 28.5 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 46 105 observations from 03/17/1983 to 07/06/1998 104 less than values and 0 zero values ( 99 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 47 109 observations from 11/16/1979 to 07/06/1998 106 less than values and 0 zero values ( 97.2 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 20 500 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 53 52 observations from 11/16/1979 to 04/12/1990 45 less than values and 1 zero values ( 88.5 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 0 60 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 20 120 observations from 06/26/1979 to 07/06/1998 111 less than values and 0 zero values ( 92.5 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 3 500 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 22 115 observations from 09/27/1967 to 07/06/1998 109 less than values and 0 zero values ( 94.8 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 30 500 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 23 110 observations from 11/16/1979 to 07/06/1998 10 less than values and 0 zero values ( 9.1 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 500 500 600 1260 3375 4110 7900 Station: 27 103 observations from 06/26/1979 to 07/06/1998 92 less than values and 0 zero values ( 89.3 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 10 132 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 19 110 observations from 03/17/1983 to 07/06/1998 110 less than values and 0 zero values ( 100 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Station: 21 139 observations from 06/23/1967 to 07/06/1998 108 less than values and 0 zero values ( 77.7 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 10 38 500 500 500 500 2700 Station: 32 52 observations from 11/16/1979 to 06/05/1991 50 less than values and 0 zero values ( 96.2 %) Statistics of the raw data 0% 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% 100% 10 500 500 500 500 500 500 Summary report saved in obed.Mn.summary. *** S-ESTREND Processing status. *** Mn 19 data OK 20 data OK 21 data OK 22 data OK 23 data OK 27 data OK 32 data OK 38 data OK 46 data OK 47 data OK 53 data OK *** S-ESTREND Seasonal Analysis *** Constituent: Mn Station: 38 Record length -- 31 years, samples 06/23/1967 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1967 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 14 Middle record number of years = 18 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 57.14 64.29 MI 55.56 55.56 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 57.14 42.86 64.29 57.14 MI 50.00 44.44 55.56 44.44 Station: 46 Record length -- 15.3 years, samples 03/17/1983 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1983 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 6 Middle record number of years = 10 All possible within-season comparisons can be made for the 2-season definition. Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 83.33 83.33 100 100 MI 100.00 80.00 100 70 Station: 47 Record length -- 18.6 years, samples 11/16/1979 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1980 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 8 Middle record number of years = 11 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 75 75 MI 100 100 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 62.5 50.00 75 62.50 MI 100.0 90.91 100 81.82 Station: 53 Record length -- 10.4 years, samples 11/16/1979 to 04/12/1990 Period of seasonal analysis: 1980 to 1990 Beginning-ending record number of years = 4 Middle record number of years = 7 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 75.00 75.00 MI 85.71 85.71 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 MI 71.43 85.71 85.71 71.43 Station: 20 Record length -- 19 years, samples 06/26/1979 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1979 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 8 Middle record number of years = 12 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 62.50 75 MI 91.67 100 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 62.50 37.50 75 50.00 MI 91.67 83.33 100 83.33 Station: 22 Record length -- 30.8 years, samples 09/27/1967 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1968 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 12 Middle record number of years = 19 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 58.33 50.00 MI 52.63 57.89 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 58.33 41.67 50.00 50.00 MI 47.37 47.37 57.89 42.11 Station: 23 Record length -- 18.6 years, samples 11/16/1979 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1980 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 8 Middle record number of years = 11 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 75 75 MI 100 100 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 62.5 50.00 62.5 62.50 MI 100.0 90.91 100.0 81.82 Station: 27 Record length -- 19 years, samples 06/26/1979 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1979 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 8 Middle record number of years = 12 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 62.5 75.00 MI 75.0 91.67 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 62.50 37.50 75.00 50 MI 66.67 66.67 83.33 75 Station: 19 Record length -- 15.3 years, samples 03/17/1983 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1983 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 6 Middle record number of years = 10 All possible within-season comparisons can be made for the 2-season definition. Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 83.33 83.33 100 100 MI 100.00 90.00 100 80 Station: 21 Record length -- 31 years, samples 06/23/1967 to 07/06/1998 Period of seasonal analysis: 1967 to 1998 Beginning-ending record number of years = 14 Middle record number of years = 18 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 57.14 64.29 MI 61.11 61.11 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 57.14 42.86 64.29 57.14 MI 50.00 55.56 61.11 50.00 Station: 32 Record length -- 11.6 years, samples 11/16/1979 to 06/05/1991 Period of seasonal analysis: 1980 to 1991 Beginning-ending record number of years = 6 Middle record number of years = 6 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 2-season definition. 1 2 BE 50 66.67 MI 100 100.00 Percent of possible within-season comparisons for the 4-season definition. 1 2 3 4 BE 50.00 0 66.67 0.00 MI 83.33 100 100.00 83.33 Percent possible comparisons within a season adequate to define trend: 50 Percent of seasons satisfying above criterion to qualify for seasonal definition: 80 *** S-ESTREND Seasonal selections *** Constituent: Mn Station BE MI select 1 38 2 2 2 2 46 4 4 4 3 47 4 4 4 4 53 2 4 2 5 20 2 4 2 6 22 2 2 2 7 23 4 4 4 8 27 2 4 2 9 19 4 4 4 10 21 2 4 2 11 32 2 4 2 *** S-ESTREND Flow-adjustment models *** Constituent: Mn Station: 38 Percentage of censored values ( 84.1269841269841 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 Zero values (nondetected values with unrecorded reporting limit) were found No flow adjustment Station: 46 Percentage of censored values ( 99.047619047619 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment Station: 47 Percentage of censored values ( 97.2477064220184 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment Station: 53 Percentage of censored values ( 88.4615384615385 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 Zero values (nondetected values with unrecorded reporting limit) were found No flow adjustment Station: 20 Percentage of censored values ( 92.5 ) exceeds 5 3 censoring levels were found [1] 3 500 5 No flow adjustment Station: 22 Percentage of censored values ( 94.7826086956522 ) exceeds 5 2 censoring levels were found [1] 500 50 No flow adjustment Station: 23 Percentage of censored values ( 9.09090909090909 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment Station: 27 Percentage of censored values ( 89.3203883495146 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment Station: 19 Percentage of censored values ( 100 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment Station: 21 Percentage of censored values ( 77.6978417266187 ) exceeds 5 2 censoring levels were found [1] 500 200 No flow adjustment Station: 32 Percentage of censored values ( 96.1538461538462 ) exceeds 5 1 censoring levels were found [1] 500 No flow adjustment *** S-ESTREND Trend Test results *** Constituent: Mn Station: 38 $tobit: [1] "Percentage of detections in less than use specified limit" Station: 46 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 47 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 53 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 20 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 22 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 23 Call: survReg(formula = formula.temp, data = data, na.action = na.exclude, dist = "gaussian", model = T) Value Std. Error z p (Intercept) 7.4375 0.1796 41.41 0.000 Year -0.0279 0.0188 -1.49 0.136 Log(scale) -0.1082 0.0734 -1.47 0.140 Scale= 0.897 Gaussian distribution Loglik(model)= -138.4 Loglik(intercept only)= -139.5 Chisq= 2.19 on 1 degrees of freedom, p= 0.14 Number of Newton-Raphson Iterations: 2 n= 107 Correlation of Coefficients: (Intercept) Year Year -0.873 Log(scale) -0.030 0.006 Station: 27 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 19 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 21 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 32 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" *** S-ESTREND Trend Summary *** Constituent: Mn STAID Type Begyear Numyears Numseasons N Trend Trend.pct P.value Sig 1 38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 47 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 53 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 23 Tobit 1982 16 NA 107 NA -2.754711 0.1364246 none 8 27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10 21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA *** S-ESTREND Trend Test results *** Constituent: Mn Station: 38 $tobit: [1] "Percentage of detections in less than use specified limit" Station: 46 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 47 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 53 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 20 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 22 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 23 Call: survReg(formula = formula.temp, data = data, na.action = na.exclude, dist = "gaussian", model = T) Value Std. Error z p (Intercept) 7.3757 0.1720 42.883 0.000 Year -0.0201 0.0215 -0.934 0.350 Log(scale) -0.0895 0.0760 -1.177 0.239 Scale= 0.914 Gaussian distribution Loglik(model)= -128.7 Loglik(intercept only)= -129.2 Chisq= 0.87 on 1 degrees of freedom, p= 0.35 Number of Newton-Raphson Iterations: 2 n= 98 Correlation of Coefficients: (Intercept) Year Year -0.841 Log(scale) -0.039 0.018 Station: 27 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 19 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 21 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" Station: 32 $tobit: [1] "Fewer than 10 detections in record" *** S-ESTREND Trend Summary *** Constituent: Mn STAID Type Begyear Numyears Numseasons N Trend Trend.pct P.value Sig 1 38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3 47 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 53 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 23 Tobit 1983 14 NA 98 NA -1.98752 0.3500933 none 8 27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9 19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10 21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA